On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:29:33PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 14:21:51 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:57:08PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Would it be possible to use oUnit too?
I'm not clear on what benefit oUnit gives us which is worth the extra dependency it pulls in.
I was referring to OUnit2, which we already have an optional dependency for almost all the OCaml tests.
Sure, understood. But what would we lose by converting those to simple programs that just ran a series of "assert"s? If a single test fails we have to fix it anyway. If the lack of oUnit2 means that other users are skipping those tests, oUnit2 may be a negative. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW